This is not written by me (haven’t been up to writing much of anything lately). But… it certainly reflects my feelings on certain sheeple-like responses to the “new” environmental movement:
——Begin Paste—–
The film “An Incovenient Truth” (sic) would make a great presentation if it would tell you the truth about global warming , it’s quick flashing scenes and ill begotten music gave me a sense of forbodding and doesn’t not help to convey a sense of workable energy alternatives, this film made me feel helpless and depressed. Much of the film is with Al Gore without anyone really backing up his views , it is like a big ego trip.My conclusion is if you want a pure disaster horror film then this is the one for you, but if you want a unbiased view of global temperature change then look to the bbc horizion documentary about global climate change. the nobel prize has lost all of its meaning and prestige since Al Gore got his. If anyone believes that humans causes global warming is either ignorant or having an agenda. Al Gore does have an agenda, look at his new company which buys and sells carbon credits, instant money for nothing.The “Greener” religion just doesn’t standup to Scientific facts. Al Gore would sell his mother for a little feel good publicity. Alfred Nobel is probably rolling in his grave over what the Nobel prize become. The Nobel Peace Prize had lost it prestige long ago when it was given to Arafat, the father of modern terrorism.
In Britain, a High Court judge declared that Mr Gore’s campaigning documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, contained nine crucial scientific errors and was a “political film” rather than an impartial analysis of climate change, restricting its use in schools.
The nine alleged errors in the film:
Read the rest of this entry »
You Like?